Breakout Groups: Themes & Issues
Portland Metropolitan Regional Meeting

Alpine #1

People

  • Focus on future workforce, diverse
  • Include options for non-college educated
  • Fund and articulate and improve K-Gray education
  • Connect with public
  • Restore confidence in institutions
  • End brain drain
  • Grow population with stake in Portland

Place

  • Build community identity
  • Build links between people and government
  • Most important asset of visitor industry, our image/brand, clean, green, friendly
  • Planning
  • Cost of housing
  • Build shared understanding of Oregon
  • Quality of life versus standard of living
  • Environment AND economy

Productivity

  • Use initiative process to break logjam on funding
  • Top leaders need to support business aims
  • End/eliminate shifting procedural and regulatory targets
  • Develop public/private partnerships
  • Develop sense of shared future
  • Business and livability linked
  • Create stability in regulatory system
  • End turf wars among levels of government regulating same things
  • New regulations: first do no harm

Pioneering Innovation

  • New business/tech sectors
  • Resources there – access unclear
  • Mentoring
  • More business friendly government
  • Collaboration/cooperation culture
  • State “culture” to embrace innovators
  • Promote tech transfer
  • Need leadership, need to decide and go, process oriented
  • Leadership, decide on unified program for state and encourage leadership
  • End “good is good enough” attitude, embrace “best” and success
  • Common vision a starting point
  • Centers of knowledge creation, focus


Alpine #2

People

  • Stable funding/K-12
  • Matching dollars w/ industry needs and programming
  • Technical high school and trade high schools
  • Last two years, focus on specific training
  • Education option for post-secondary
  • College preparation courses/programs
  • More $ for “flexible” ed programs
  • Better focus on arts and creative education
  • Funding for engineering school/programs, R&D
  • More focus on science-based programs earlier
  • Build constituency for increased higher ed funding
  • More help for folks on the margins to access quality education

Place

  • Maintain efficient transportation infrastructure
  • Focus on balancing economy and environment, not either/or
  • Analyze European and other models
  • Increase/improve livability: affordable housing, better access to arts/education, more local recreation opportunities, stronger park and greenspace planning.
  • Maintain strong public safety services
  • Early intervention programs
  • More support for mental health services

Productivity

  • Agriculture: don’t abandon our basic industries, encourage value added agriculture programs, focus ag-related resources on local communities
  • Leadership; public and private collaboration
  • Build support for a collaborative approach to policy making
  • Overhauling the tax system
  • Stable transportation funding

Pioneering Innovation

  • Access to capital
  • New business incentives, attracting
  • Tech transfer
  • Brand Oregon
  • Global/International commerce


Alpine #3

People

  • #1 Priority, K-12 declining, college ratings scores going down
  • Investments in people in education is Oregon’s best option
  • Decline in quality education investments are having negative effect on Oregon
  • Oregon’s education climate decline represents a tough sell for attracting business investment

Place

  • Place is the last unspoiled advantage Oregon has
  • Environmental regulations are tough but Oregon can work to save quality environment
  • Pay more to promote/save Oregon’s essential recreation options
  • Resistance to “Pay to Play” on Oregon recreations

Productivity

  • Significant cluster of warehousing and distribution which lives on good transportation infrastructure
  • Industrial lands to support expansions of new/existing business
  • Included costs for transportation of goods is critical for global competitiveness for Oregon businesses
  • Education is a fundamental infrastructure
  • Commercialization of ideas from universities
  • High PERS/capital gains tax rates drive important clusters out of Oregon
  • To revise Oregon tax structure will require support/commitment by business community
  • Attracting key employers is influenced by education infrastructure
  • Need stability fund to support essential services of government including education/public safety
  • Include investments in education, less investments in regulatory agencies that restrains economy of Oregon
  • Regulatory climate can retain or drive out investments
  • Use regulation to “incent” business investments that improve Oregon environmental climate vs. tax to prevent
  • Permit/fees has created negative climate for business investments
  • Increase in permit fees have been implemented to replace loss of tax revenues
  • Oregon need to take risks to create new answers to challenges
  • Tax restructuring won’t happen until populace believes priority investments are not education
  • Do we have sufficient incentives to encourage existing Oregon businesses to expand?
  • Oregon’s high school dropout rates create other public service costs paid by taxes
  • PERS funding challenges are creating financial burdens on all public services
  • Oregonians would vote for a targeted sales tax for essential services in education

Pioneering Innovation

  • Need for more venture capital
  • Need for life science, early seed/venture capital needed
  • Jobs to fuel Oregon’s public innovation
  • International trade assistance/support to increase Oregon companies’ exports
  • Greater understanding/commitment to International events
  • Increase export/import trade through Oregon/PDX to expand International markets
  • Transportation system to facilitate movement of goods/services to global markets


Los Colinas/Summerlin #1

People

  • Workforce, higher ed investments
  • K-12 perceptions/reality on hiring – perhaps more import than training workers
  • Have to be good K-12, fewer competing factors
  • Health care = hires locally
  • “Procedures” need greater demand
  • Training by manufactures on the job
  • Healthcare = hi-tech
  • Need for workforce training specific
  • Connect art and business design

Place

  • Urban growth boundary limits growth
  • Sense of environment linked to land use/growth
  • Will we lose place by meeting infrastructure needs?
  • Superfund at Port
  • Overestimate place as an advantage
  • Do we focus on it too much
  • #1 cost to operate, #2 cost to operate
  • Where would we be without it
  • Social engineering needs tweaking

Productivity

  • Distribution/logistics a strength
  • Cost issues for new folks
  • Regulatory attitudes, need for an ombudsman, level playing field, certainty

Pioneering Innovation


Los Colinas/Summerlin #2

People

  • Use quality ed model to have accountability and results, must not leave people behind
  • Skills important

Place

  • Lack of competitive priced business land
  • Resolve business versus environmentalists
  • Sensitivity to local standards, different density goals
  • Utility costs (energy and water)
  • Deal w/ land use issues
  • Crime is a growing problem

Productivity

  • Tax structure, too hard on small to mid cap investments by companies
  • Over regulation in tech: Rather than results, too much, uncertainty
  • Unfunded mandates (e.g. health plan cuts hit providers by not adjusting)
  • Streamlining permitting, overly involved w/ process
  • Lack of appropriately zoned land
  • Tie incentive to attracting new as well as existing business
  • New process technologies can’t be accommodated
  • Keep permitting as a separate category

Pioneering Innovation

  • Lack of venture capital
  • Don’t’ have an eny. to support new companies
  • Important to link different steps necessary to go from research to products
  • More focus on export ready companies
  • Take advantage of Oregon’s sustainable development reputation
  • More incentive for industry-university partnerships


Los Colinas/Summerlin #3

People

  • Overall education system needs fix
  • Collaborative effort with focus to address problems/system
  • Education appears unstable, sends wrong message
  • Review tax system
  • Additional expectations: more diverse student population

Place

  • Clustering important, how to grow new ones
  • Jobs, housing balance important
  • Available land, review state laws, need choice
  • Public safety

Productivity

  • Tax reform
  • News taxes, elements could be a disincentive to attract workers

Pioneering Innovation


Blue Canyon #1

People

  • Now is great time to hire – good workforce/qualified people are available
  • More dollars needed for existing workforce training – invest in existing employees don’t always spend resources on retraining unemployed
  • Right kinds of training course are not always available
  • Healthcare in particular facing shortage or workers and yet don’t have training programs to support needed workforce; good health delivery systems key part of quality of life
  • Better training for bioscience industry (a highly regulated industry) as well – do have programs in community colleges, also need four year programs
  • State gets low marks across the board for K-post university system; both funding and commitment to quality
  • Lacking major research university; don’t have top notch engineering university
  • Universities/community college not as well coordinated as could be – are resources being used most efficiently and effectively?
  • Oregon has been lucky – while we lack top notch universities, we have benefited from intellectual spin offs from companies like Intel
  • Lack an overall strategy – should have integration from K-5 to middle to high school on to college
  • Oregon’s population is diversifying, need to be able to deal with this
  • Better understanding relationships between university system and business

Place

  • Place should be in harmony with the other 3 quadrants – shouldn’t dominate
  • We can’t afford to rely on place; “place” is not as big a competitive factor for Oregon as it use to be
  • Oregon has a good foundation – all our work in planning and infrastructure should now be allowed to work for us; let’s grow on our foundation
  • How do we move on – keep it all terrific place for the future
  • If we don’t have a healthy economy we can’t support a quality place (public safety, education, etc.)
  • The recession has certainly highlighted the importance of the economy and how it supports our public services
  • Quality development and controlling sprawl – what does this really mean?
  • Industrial lands – either don’t have it or isn’t ready to go
  • Places issues shouldn’t be treated as win-lose

Productivity

  • Need to talk more about the benefits of investments in transportation infrastructure and quit arguing over costs
  • Tax structure needs to be fixed
  • Stable funding source for schools; shouldn’t argue over curriculum; we need to solve how to pay for it
  • Regulatory environment is inefficient and dysfunctional – permitting needs streamlining, etc.
  • “It is not a single product model, nor a single manager, nor one ad, nor one single celebrity, not even a single innovation that is the key to Nike. It is the people of Nike and their unique and creative way of working together.” – Phil Knight

Pioneering Innovation

  • International resources underutilized; sister cities, alumni
  • International trade risky and takes $
  • Entrepreneurial vitality not one of our strong points
  • Angel funds available; anything beyond that not here/available; lack of expansion capital
  • Clinical studies for drug trials (FDA approved) are happening overseas – opportunity to do this in Oregon
  • Oregon does have a strong track record for innovation in agriculture and forest products and also high tech. But we don’t celebrate it/tout our success
  • Clearing house for entrepreneurial type business – learn from each other?
  • Biggest hurdles for new ideas/entrepreneurs ‡ access to capital and process/regulations/permits required to start or grow a business
  • State finance programs have not adapted – changed requirements to meet needs of start-ups/entrepreneurial businesses
  • Fed cap on business development funds limits ability to help
  • Asset lending versus intellectual growth business don’t have assets therefore can’t borrow $ from banks


Blue Canyon #2

People

  • Importance: Higher Ed in the short-term, K-12 in long-term
  • Business/professional education
  • Adult education/literacy/ESL

Place

  • Not a priority unless other areas are addressed

Productivity

  • Movement of people, goods, ideas, business costs

Pioneering Innovation

  • International trade
  • New company spawning
  • Venture capital activity ‡ R&D ‡ patents ‡ Venture Capital
  • Attitude of government at all levels


Blue Canyon #3

People

  • Train student to achieve at highest global levels
  • First class continuing education, during employment
  • Finance system for schools
  • Foreign language training
  • Community colleges, especially rural
  • Prison labor for some production
  • Invest in higher ed faculty (bring research dollars), use tax credits

Place

  • More economic development in some parts of Portland, appearances, safety
  • Transportation funding, not just light rail
  • Over-focus on livability at expense of business development
  • Need to be able to live near jobs
  • Change land use criteria: must account for economic criteria, allow local jurisdictions “super-siting”

Productivity

  • Transportation linkages need to be funded – multimodal
  • Industrial land, especially for warehousing and distribution
  • Streamline land use process and permitting – to much focus on regulating as opposed to helping companies through process
  • Change tax structure – need leadership
  • Educate public – information system about taxes, regulations, education system (needs to be grassroots, need coalition including business, unions, education)
  • Business participation in public organizations – with backbone

Pioneering Innovation

  • Capital – but where? Have capital but right stage? Not just for hi-tech
  • Increase entrepreneurial spirit: Venture capital
  • Access to International marketplace (Productivity): flights, ship channels, roads
  • Help with the “how to” of international trade, awareness of what’s here already.
  • Education: attract kids to math and science (people)
  • State Ag marketing with Economic development marketing
  • Economic leadership, rebranding of Oregon
  • Tax incentives, sell tax credits to other companies
  • Best private leaders ‡ State government


Muirfield #1

People

  • Support K-12/pre-gray
  • 7:1 return on investment in education
  • Dedicated funding for K-12
  • Community colleges to provide technical/professional skills in middle of job pyramid
  • Workforce training
  • Re-training (through Economic Development Department or similar)
  • How to inspire young students to creative careers if art/music/design disappears from K-12 curriculum?
  • Foreign language: Need broader offerings; full-year classes; expand immersion classes (preparing for global community/economy)

Place

  • Arts in the schools (raise committed/astute audiences)
  • Portland Metro should become center for sustainable design
  • Preserving open space and maintaining recreation assets
  • Link Metro open space with fed lands
  • Plan/anticipate tension between need for “green space” and increasing urban density
  • Keep “overhead” cost of doing business low
  • Keep focused on advantages of place even in down economy
  • Reduce rate of Oregon

Productivity

  • Intra-Metro area discrepancy in business license tax
  • Pay closer attention to cumulative impact of fees/taxes/regulations on local businesses
  • Consider the incentive/disincentive of tax structure
  • Timeliness and complexity of permitting/regulations
  • Maximize use of “e-government”
  • Improve electronic infrastructure
  • Keep physical infrastructure working

Pioneering Innovation

  • Policies to support firm formation, tech transfer, innovation
  • Higher ed/research capacity: graduate degrees; in metro area; expand research, especially in funded research; emphasize commercialization
  • Transition UO, PSU, OSU toward public corporation status (like OHSU)
  • “Grow our own”
  • Support 80% of economy that’s already here (not just recruit big outside firms)
  • Make regulations to help Oregon businesses grow
  • Air service, especially International


Muirfield #2

People

  • Standard setting
  • What is good against what peer group?
  • Myths and realities, know the differences
  • Immediacy
  • Federal dollars for research/higher education
  • Higher ed is getting there, it is solid
  • Commitment, no follow through
  • Knowledge businesses need trained people, engineering investments
  • Access to education
  • Adequate funding in right place
  • Mechanisms to invest in right places
  • Know right thing
  • Diversity is a reality

Place

  • Quality growth, land use issues
  • Imbalanced between planning and economic forces
  • Urban growth flexibility
  • Transportation

Productivity

  • Business costs, taxes too high
  • SDC to high
  • Process and overhead
  • Access to capital

Pioneering Innovation

  • Losing people, technology locked in University


Muirfield #3

People

  • 4-year institutions – beef-up in science (community colleges relatively overfunded?)
  • Aim for a “10” in science area within educational institutions where we also have cluster potential (i.e. support for our clusters with higher education programs)
  • K-12 – funding and quality; need quality as attraction feature for outsiders

Place

  • Changes regarding urban growth boundary – need land where industry needs are
  • Commute times – keep them manageable
  • Bridge “growth/no growth” divide
  • Provide jobs to encourage a progressive vision for growth

Productivity

  • Deepen Columbia channel
  • Change tax system in the context of what we want the state to do/be
  • Be cautious about mandating what companies pay in images
  • Implement key regulation reforms and follow through on City’s and Oregon’s part
  • Redefine how health care is financed and delivered
  • Create “fast track” possibility for desirable companies
  • Keep government out of private business (e.g. PGE) – or look at privatization of services

Pioneering Innovation

  • Attract talent from out of state (researchers with potential of commercialization, “proven winners).
  • Use tax changes to lure key people
  • Convince foundations to invest in outside venture capital firms in exchange for placing a partner in Portland
  • Flights abroad
  • Subsidize incoming foreign flights

    back to top